role: user

text:
<image name=[Image #1]>
[input_image]
</image>
got our first message from Sarah!  [Image #1]


role: assistant

text:
Yes. Sarah’s first message is substantive.

She says:
- she was out part of `Friday, March 13, 2026`, in mediation on `Monday, March 16, 2026`, and in court this morning, `Tuesday, March 17, 2026`
- she’ll review everything and get back to you before `Wednesday, March 18, 2026`
- she wants two clarifications:
  - is the `Wednesday, March 18` meeting with `Jennifer Piper` a `mediation consultation` or an actual `mediation session`?
  - is the brief you shared something `Jennifer Piper` asked you to prepare?

The clean answer is probably:
- `consultation`, not an actual mediation session
- `no`, the brief was your own background memo, not something Piper requested

Suggested reply:

```text
Hi Sarah,

Thank you for the update.

My understanding is that the call with Jennifer Piper on Wednesday, March 18 is a mediation consultation, not an actual mediation session.

And no — the brief I shared was not something Ms. Piper asked me to prepare. It was something I put together myself to clearly frame the financial context and the core issues from my perspective, in case it is helpful.

Thank you,
Karl
```

If you want, I can tighten that further or copy it to `pbcopy`.


text: pbcopy please!


text: Copying the reply to your clipboard.


text: Copied to your clipboard.