role: user

text: pull messages


role: assistant

text: Pulling the latest Lisa thread again now. I’ll sync the bounded window and summarize only what changed.


text:
New from Lisa at `2026-03-13 12:47 CT`:

- `Right. I was responding to you saying that I had not replied to your question about what is fair.`

So she’s narrowing the dispute:
- not arguing the mediation point
- just saying her earlier message was meant to answer your `what is fair?` question

No other new inbound after that.


text: how should we respond?


text:
Keep it short and close the loop.

Use this:

```text
Understood. I hear that. I still think the rest of this is better handled in mediation.
```

I would not say more than that.


text: send please.


text: Saving the exact text first, then sending that exact version.


text: Sent exactly as written from `outbox/messages/2026-03-13_to_lisa_understood_better_handled_in_mediation.txt`.


text:
New from Lisa at `2026-03-13 12:58 CT`:

- She asks what you meant by waiting until mediation.
- Specifically, she wants to know whether that means you are not planning to send the calculations after all.
- She says she is trying to run the numbers on her side and has questions about some of the assumptions, so it would help her to understand what you’re working from.

That is the only new inbound since your last reply.


text: what should we say?


text:
Use this:

```text
What I mean is that I’ve already shared my opening framework, and I’m not planning to keep unpacking detailed calculations and assumptions by text before mediation. Given where the conversation has gotten, I think that level of detail is better handled there, with both of us putting our positions on the table in the same setting.
```