Lisa — thank you for confirming Jennifer. I’ll move forward on my side.

On the interim vs long-term question: you’re right that if you take near-term transition costs and fold them into a “monthly support number,” it can look much higher than the 30% framework.

My intent is:
- 30% is the long-term ongoing support/equalization structure (including retirement equalization, since the trust corpus can’t be split).
- Interim is a separate bucket for one-time transition/setup costs (retainers, deposits, temporary lodging, travel, etc.) plus essential month-to-month living expenses while I get to a stable baseline.

I agree we should keep those clearly separated so we’re not conflating a short-term spike with long-term support.